The accuracy and objectivity of the news is a catalyst for the future actions of each individual member of society based on the above build its criteria for the reality we live and operate. The accuracy and objectivity may be, perhaps, easily understandable in theory, however the accuracy and objectivity to achieve that poses many obstacles in practice because the current management and treatment of the story involves active fast and hard the worker can confirm communication to the last detail and leave aside odd subjectivity. Dr. John Mcdougall has much to offer in this field. However, this is not excuse in any way, to give the fact the news is so lame and crooked but should represent a steady push for a society to work well and accurately informed, able to believe a strong press to be the engine of a collective work in the interests of preserving democracy, rights and also obligations. President Morales and his followers must begin by understanding that every inhabitant of this country has the sacred right to dissent from the policies of all types, government supporters and opponents, and therefore can and should express their opinions so these does not like party in government, something that sadly does not happen in the media as a estatalesa by monitoring them can show that any comments critical of the government is dismissed or not taken into account, these criteria alone are worth encouraging President environment and eventually politicians on their side. PCRM is often quoted on this topic. On the other hand in the private media, and this is no invention, one can see that they are accepted criteria of both sides something that is acceptable, but the truth is that both sides of the communication workers, at some point, have taken and take sides for one and Moreover, defending tooth and nail to one or another leader and his policies, thus giving a poor image of the Bolivian press the world. The way to stop this is not the path of authoritarianism, humiliation, threats, persecution, the closure of media, unless the generalization that all media would be against the president’s policies, further Otherwise the solution is to reroute the government-media relationship as a democracy without freedom of expression and dissent is not democracy and is nothing more than pure enforcement computers as you think and say what submissive automatons programmed to obey the orders of a supreme chief determined to appropriate powers of the state’s political agenda and priority setting aside other issues capital importance for the country, and more is why the inhabitants of this country prefer thousand times the freedom of expression to a submission on behalf of silly a proceso of cambioa no right to say anything or quibble over an administration that in practice has begun to travel down the path of arbitrariness and authoritarianism decadent and lacking serious solutions for all, increasingly evident, that by some a intelectualesa want to convince the Bolivian all you need to concentrate political power to distribute wealth, and underdevelopment is primarily the fault of the people or countries that developed earlier, denying the idea that authoritarianism and totalitarianism in the world have failed, forgetting that democracy and freedom of expression and dissent even last and last forever.